Reply I don't think that any sort of linking is necessary no matter what wiki it is on. So, until we can find a better alternative, let's link to that chanchan article, as it's better than the old linked article at wikiworld anyway. Lurkmore's chanchan wiki was originally copied from wikiworld, but has since gotten a bit larger. ( Steampowered 19:13, 17 September 2006 (UTC)) Reply Well, they finally erased everything on the WikiWorld articles. Anyway, regardless of which we use, we need to a wiki to direct people to so that they don't put them here. Another alternative could be the etherchan wiki. In my opinion, it would be best to shift focus onto the lurkmore wiki, as lurkmore will not delete such references, as lurkmore more or less sprung out of the community surrounding 4chan and as such is not shocked or made uneasy by such references. Hell, some of the memes that relate directly to child pornography shape the core of the community, whether I like to admit it or not. I suggest that we use it instead, unless someone has objections to it.- 62.249.176.102 17:08, 15 September 2006 (UTC) Reply Neither really have any sort of reliability behind them, as they are both Wikis, but if the main complaint with the WikiWorld site is that they're planning on removing all of the references to child pornography, then how many 4chan memes is that? Ryūlóng 17:21, 15 September 2006 (UTC) Reply Many of them.
was posted on the Meme article's talk page. Therefore, if we are going to still have an encyclopedia over 4chan's memes, we need to link or make another encyclopedia elsewhere. This may not be related to the article, but my edit was rolled back so I figured that I'd take it here.Īs you guys know, or not know, Wikiworld has threatened to delete the Meme articles because of references to sexual intercourse(with children) and such.
0 kommentar(er)
